Ideology and Participation in Independent Media: ethical Tensions Around the Notion of “Independence”
Abstract
This article examines how “independence” is articulated in self-described “independent media”, and the ethical tensions that emerge in its relation to ideology, participation and technological mediation. Drawing on a case-study approach and a qualitative analysis of documents, participatory arrangements and coverage of sensitive issues, it examines six European cases funded primarily through subscriptions and membership schemes. The findings show that independence cannot be reduced to ownership structures or funding models. Although these outlets strengthen their autonomy from advertisers, corporate groups and political parties, they nonetheless configure a form of selective independence, insofar as they depend symbolically on ideologically like-minded communities. Participation is concentrated among the most active and aligned segments, fostering dynamics of rule by the already convinced, and is organised through socio-technical arrangements that shape access, visibility and intervention. Independence functions both as a normative ideal and as a pledge of loyalty; its democratising reach is tied to the capacity to sustain internal dissent and to subject one’s own dependencies to critical scrutiny.
Downloads
References
Atton, C. (2002). Alternative Media. SAGE.
Bailey, O., Cammaerts, B., & Carpentier, N. (2008). Understanding Alternative Media.
McGraw-Hill.
Bertrand, C.J. (2000). Media Ethics and Accountability Systems. Transaction Publishers.
Berkowitz, D. (2018). Interpretive Community. In T.P. Vos; F. Hanusch; D. Dimitrakopoulou; M. Geertsema-Sligh and A. Sehl (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0024
Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and Participation: A site of ideological-democratic
struggle. Intellect.
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2010). Prensa en internet: nuevos modelos de negocio en el escenario de la convergencia. El Profesional de la Información, 19(6), 595–601.
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Research on political information and social media: Key points and challenges for the future. El profesional de la información, 27(5), 964–974.
Chaparro-Domínguez, M. Á., Suárez-Villegas, J. C., & Rodríguez-Martínez, R. (2020). Media Accountability and Journalists: To Whom Do Spanish Professionals Feel Responsible? Journalism Practice, 14(7), 812–829.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1655470
Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. University of Illinois Press.
Coleman, S. & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge University Press.
Couldry, N. (2008) Media and the problem of voice. En C. Nico and de C. Benjamin, (eds.), Participation and media production: critical reflections on content creation (pp. 15-26). Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464.
Eagleton, T. (1991/1997). Ideología: una introducción. Paidós.
Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Lauk, E., & Leppik-Bork, T. (Eds.). (2011). Mapping Media Accountability in Europe and Beyond. Herbert von Halem Verlag.
Ferrer-Conill, R. & Tandoc, E. C. (2018). The Audience-Oriented Editor: Making Senseof the Audience in the Newsroom. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 436–453.
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Paying for Online News: A comparative analysis of six countries. Digital Journalism, 5(9), 1173–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1246373
Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard University Press.
Geertz, C. (1973/2003). La interpretación de las culturas. Gedisa.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.
González-Hernández, D. (2009). Los medios de comunicación y la estructuración de las audiencias masivas. Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, 15(29), 37-68.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Polity Press.
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, H., Ford, S. & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. NYU Press.
Kaplún, G. (2007). La comunicación comunitaria en América Latina. En B. Díaz Nosty (coord.), Medios de comunicación. El escenario iberoamericano (pp. 311-320). Ariel.
Kovach, B., Rosenstiel, T. (2012). Los elementos del periodismo. Todo lo que los periodistas deben saber y los ciudadanos esperar. Penguin Random House.
Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S., & Boyer, M. M. (2019). The Promise of “Supporter” Models in Journalism: An Experimental Study of the Effects of Membership-like Features on Perceptions of Journalism. Journalism Studies, 20(16), 2363–2382.
Lauk, E. y Harro-Loit, H. (2016). Journalistic Autonomy as a Professional Value and Element of Journalism Culture: The European Perspective. International Journal of Communication, 11,1956–1974.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 1–29.
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. Sage.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. y Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily insocial networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
Muguerza, J. (1990). Ética, disenso y democracia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Nielsen, R.K. (2015). The Increasingly Digital Business of News. En T. Witschge, C.W. Anderson, D. Domingo y A. Hermida (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Digital Journalism. Sage.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Ross Arguedas, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024).Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Peters, C. & Broersma, M. (eds.) (2013). Rethinking Journalism: Trust and Participation in a Transformed News Landscape. Routledge.
Rodríguez, C. (2001). Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizens' Media. Hampton Press.
Salaverría, R. y Martínez-Costa, M. P. (coords.) (2021). Medios nativos digitales en España: caracterización y tendencias. Comunicación Social.
Scolari, C., Micó, J. L., Navarro, H. & Pardo, H. (2008). El declive de la prensa y el nuevo entorno mediático. Anàlisi, 37, 67–81.
Schudson, M. (2008). Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Polity.
Sjøvaag, H. & Krumsvik, A. H. (2017). Newspapers, Facebook and Membership: Marketers’ Reflections on the Value of Audience Relationships. Journalism Practice, 11(7), 859–876.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press.
Thompson, J. B. (1993). Ideología y cultura moderna. Teoría social crítica en la era de la comunicación de masas. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. Routledge.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Vara-Miguel, A., Sádaba, C., Negredo, S. y Sánchez-Blanco, C. (2023). Estrategias de diversificación de ingresos de las organizaciones de noticias online: suscripciones y membresías. El profesional de la información, 32(2).
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.05
Varela, M. (1999). Las audiencias en los textos. Comunidades interpretativas, forma y cambio. En A. Grimson y M. Varela, Audiencias, cultura y poder. Estudios sobre la televisión (pp. 137-157). Eudeba.
Ward, S. (2020). Objectively Engaged Journalism: An Ethic. McGill-Queen's University Press.
Ward, S. (2021). Pragmatic Objectivity for Global Ethics. In: Ward, S.J.A. (ed.)
Handbook of Global Media Ethics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_17
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ángel Barbas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png)
