Access to information and social justice: pivotal values for a critical Knowledge Organization

Keywords: KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, SOCIAL JUSTICE, ACCESS TO INFORMATION, ETHICS OF CARE, CRITICAL THEORIES

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of archives and libraries in promoting social justice and equitable access to information through the lens of Knowledge Organization (KO). It explores how critical and ethical perspectives, including socio-cognitive and epistemological approaches, reshape the organizational practices of these institutions, emphasizing their influence on broader societal narratives. By focusing on professional values such as access to information and social justice, the study highlights how archives and libraries can transcend their traditional roles as custodians of information to become active agents in fostering inclusivity and equity. The paper also underscores the importance of incorporating the ethics of care and critical theory as complementary frameworks to professional codes, fostering relational sensitivity and responsiveness to marginalized communities while challenging systems of oppression embedded in knowledge organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler, M. (2016). The Case for Taxonomic Reparations. Knowledge Organization, 43(8): 630-40. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-8-630.

Adler, M., & Harper, L.M. (2018). Knowledge Organization from a social justice perspective. Library Trends, 67(1): 52-73.

Brilmyer, G. (2018). Archival assemblages: applying disability studies’ political/relational model to archival description. Archival Science, 18(2):95-118, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-018-9287-6.

Campbell, G. (2000). Queer theory and the creation of contextual subject access tools for gay and lesbian communities. Knowledge Organization 27(3): 122-31.

Caswell, M., & Cifor, M. (2016). From human rights to feminist ethics: radical empathy in the archives. Archivaria, 81(spring): 23-43.

Doyle, A.M., Lawson, K., & Dupont, S. (2015). Indigenization of Knowledge Organization at the Xwi7xwa Library. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 13(2): 107-134. https://doi:10.6182/jlis.2015.13(2).107.

Duff, W. M. & Harris, V. (2002). Stories and Names: Archival Description as Narrating Records and Constructing Meanings. Archival Science, 2(3-4): 263-85.

Fox, M. J. (2014). Enabling gender-inclusivity in essential questions.” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 55:241-9.

Fox, M.J. (2016). Priorities of Arrangement” or a “Hierarchy of Oppressions? Knowledge Organization, 43(5): 373-83.

Furner, J. (2006). Dewey Deracialized: A critical race-theoretic perspective. Knowledge Organization, 34(3):144-168

Gilliland, A. (2011). Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science, 11(3-4): 193-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0.

Hjørland, B. & Albrechtsen, A. (1995). Toward a new horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-25.

Jimerson, R. C. (2007). Archives for All: professional responsibility and social justice. The American Archivist, 70(2): 252-281. https:// doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.70.2.5n20760751v643m7

Martínez-Ávila, D., Semidão, R., & Ferreira, M. (2016) methodological aspects of critical theories in Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, 43 (2): 118 – 125.

Milani, S.O., El Hadi, W.M., & Tognoli, N.B. Introduction to the Special Issue: Critical and Social Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, 51, n. 8: 610-612. doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2024-8-610

Olson, H. A. (1997). The feminist and the Emperor’s new clothes: feminist deconstruction as a critical methodology for Library and Information Studies. Library & Information Science Research, 19(2):181-98.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(97)90042-6

Olson, H. A. (2002). The power to name: locating the limits of subject representation in libraries. Kluwer Academic.

Pinho, F. A., & Guimarães, J.A.C. (2012). Male homosexuality in Brazilian indexing languages: some ethical questions. Knowledge Organization 39(5): 363-9.

Society of American Archivists (SAA). (2012). Core Values Statement and Code of Ethics. http://www2.archivists.org/statements/saa-core-values-statement-and-code-of-ethics#core values.

Tognoli, N. B., & Rocha, G.M.Q. (2021). A justiça social na Arquivologia: uma revisão de literatura. ÁGORA: Arquivologia Em Debate, 31(63), 1–23.

Tognoli, N.B; Milani, S.O., & Guimarães, J.A.C. (2017, novembro). Elementos de indexação para arquivos permanentes: aproximações teóricas preliminares. Atas do III Congresso ISKO Espanha-Portugal e XIII Congresso ISKO Espanha, Coimbra, Portugal.

Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University.

Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Tognoli, N. B. (2025). Access to information and social justice: pivotal values for a critical Knowledge Organization. Informatio, 30(1), e203. https://doi.org/10.35643/Info.30.1.8
Section
Dossier: "Knowledge Organization: multi and interdisciplinary dialogues", coordinado por el Prof. José Augusto Chaves Guimarães (UNESP)