Dilemmas and ethical decision-making in Knowledge Organization
Abstract
Librarians assign classification numbers and indexing terms to documents through knowledge representation and knowledge organization systems, such as classification schemes, indexing languages, etc. When representation is not carried out in a reliable way, censorship, omission, or misrepresentation of information may occur. Librarians will have to deal with ethical values as well as cultural and linguistic boundaries, and they will face dilemmas that require ethical decision-making. Once librarians realize that unresolved ethical problems can be harmful to their community users, they should be respectful. Based on reports from specialized international literature, this paper proposes a discussion about the ways in which knowledge organization tools may present ethical dilemmas for librarians. By approaching the issue from an exploratory, bibliographic, and qualitative perspective, this study aims to provide elements for discussion both in courses related to knowledge organization and other areas concerned with ethical issues though an interdisciplinary approach.
Downloads
References
Adler, M. and Tennis, J. T. (2013). Toward a taxonomy of harm in knowledge organization systems. Knowledge Organization (40), pp. 266-72.
Barité, M. (2001). Organización del conocimiento: un nuevo marco teórico-conceptual en Bibliotecología y Documentación. In Carrara, K. (Ed), Educação, universidade e pesquisa (pp. 35-60). Marília: UNESP.
Beghtol, C. (2005). Ethical decision-making for knowledge representation and organization systems for global use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (56), pp. 903-12.
Budd, J. (2001). Knowledge and knowing in Library and Information Science: A philosophical framework. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press.
Budd, J. (2004). Academic libraries and knowledge: a social epistemology network. The Journal of Academic Librarianship (30), pp. 361-67.
Budd, J. (2006). Toward a practical and normative ethics for librarianship. The Library Quarterly (76), pp. 251-69.
Drabinski, E. (2013). Queering the catalog: queer theory and the politics of correction. Library Quarterly (83), pp. 94-111.
Fina, M. (1993). The role of subject headings in access to information: the experience of one speaking-patron. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly (17), pp. 267-74.
Fox, M. J. and Reece, A. (2012). Which ethics? Whose morality?: An analysis of ethical standards for information organization. Knowledge Organization (39), pp. 377-83.
Fox, M. J., Martínez-Ávila, D., and Milani, S. O. (2017). A Interseccionalidade e o Respeito às Pessoas na Organização do Conhecimento. In Alves, Marcos A., Gracio, Maria Cláudia C., and Martínez-Ávila, Daniel. Informação, conhecimento e modelos (pp. 289-53). Campinas: UNICAMP.
Froehlich, T. (2011). 10 Questions: Tom Froehlich. Information Outlook (15). Interview granted to Stuart Hales.
Hjørland, B. (2017). Domain Analysis. Knowledge Organization (44), pp. 436-64. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, Retrieved from www.isko.org/cyclo/domain_analysis#2.0
Jacobs, C. (2007). Ethical places, ethical spaces: stopping to listen. The indexer (25), pp. 161-66.
Mai, J.-E. (2010). Classification in a social world: bias and trust. Journal of Documentation (66), pp. 627-42.
Mai, J.-E. (2013). Ethics, values and morality in contemporary library classifications. Knowledge Organization (40), pp. 242-53.
Martínez-Ávila, D., Semidão, R., and Ferreira, M. (2016). Methodological aspects of critical theories in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization (43), pp. 118-25.
McQueen, K. (2015). Ethical issues of knowledge organization in designing a metadata schema for the Leo Kottke Archives. Knowledge Organization (42), pp. 332-38.
Milani, S. O., Guimarães, J. A. C., and Olson, H. A. (2014). Bias in subject representation: convergences and divergences in the international literature. In Babik, Wiesław (Ed), Knowledge Organization in the 21st Century: Between Historical Patterns and Future Prospects (pp. 335-42). Knowledge Organization 14. Würzburg: Ergon.
Oxford English Dictionary Online (2014). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olson, H. A. (2001). Patriarchal structures of subject access and subversive techniques for change. Canadian Journal for Information and Library Science (26), pp. 1-29.
Olson, H. A. (2002). The power to name: locating the limits of subject representation in libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Tennis, J. T. (2008). Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organization: toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework. Knowledge Organization (35), pp. 102-12.
Copyright (c) 2025 Suellen Oliveira Milani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png)
