Hate speech as a research object in Information Sciences
Abstract
TIn the context of an increasingly diverse society in which different identities and perspectives coexist, hate speech has also emerged and grew parallelly. This phenomenon, characterized by violent actions and expressions directed towards minorities, unprivileged groups as well as vulnerable collectives, is amplified by digital platforms and social media in particular. It poses significant challenges to a proper coexistence and human rights in our interconnected age. This article focuses on the study of hate speech in the field of Library and Information Science based on the research indexed by the Web of Science and the doctoral theses from the Ibero-American region for the period 2017-2022. We retrieved a total of 59 records that were analyzed using the software Pajek to visualize the network of scientific collaboration and the software VOSviewer to create networks of co-authorship and co-occurrence of topics. The results indicate an increase in publications on hate speech between 2017 and 2022, with a significant raise in 2021 and 2022. Spain, the United States, and Brazil stand out as the most productive countries on the topic, with universities such as Complutense University of Madrid in Spain and Federal University of Paraná in Brazil leading this research. The journal "Information Processing & Management" served as a fundamental medium for disseminating scientific knowledge about hate speech. The social network analysis revealed that most researchers in the field work individually, although there is a trend towards more stable co-authorship teams in recent years, suggesting room for greater scientific collaboration given the interdisciplinary nature of the topic. The keyword co-occurrence analysis reflects an interdisciplinary perspective encompassing computer science, social sciences, communication, and journalism in the study of hate speech within Library and Information Science.
Downloads
References
Arango, A., Pérez, J. y Poblete, B. (2019). Hate Speech Detection is Not as Easy as You May Think: A Closer Look at Model Validation. En Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'19) (pp. 45-54). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331262
Comisión Europea contra el Racismo y la Intolerancia (2016). Recomendación general no 15 relativa a la lucha contra el discurso de odio y memorándum explicativo. Adoptada el 8 de diciembre de 2015 [traducción no oficial]. European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. Disponible en: https://rm.coe.int/ecri-general-policy-recommendation-n-15-on-combating-hate-speech-adopt/16808b7904
Consejo de Europa (1997). Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on «hate speech» adopted on 30 October. Disponible en: https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680505d5b
Guterres, A. (2019) El discurso del odio, incendio arrasador. Naciones Unidas. https://www.un.org/sg/es/content/sg/articles/2019-06-18/the-wildfire-of-hate-speech
Glänzel, W. y Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. En: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W. y Schmoch, U. (eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12
Haasio, A., Mattila, M. y Ojaranta, A. (2018). The Role of Libraries in Avoiding Hate Speech and False Information. Information and Communication Sciences Research, 22(1), 9-15. Disponible en: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=762431
Ibarra, E. (2017). Registro, monitorización y análisis de los incidentes relativos a los discursos y delitos de odio. Cuadernos de análisis, 59, 5-8. Disponible en: http://www.estebanibarra.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/59-Monitorizacion-Delitos-de-Odio.pdf
MacAvaney, S., Yao, H.-R., Yang, E., Russell, K., Goharian, N. y Frieder, O. (2019). Hate speech detection: Challenges and solutions. PloS one, 14(8), e0221152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221152
Mossie, Z. y Wang, J.-H. (2020). Vulnerable community identification using hate speech detection on social media.Information Processing & Management, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102087
Naciones Unidas (2023) ¿Qué es el discurso de odio? Disponible en: https://www.un.org/es/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/what-is-hate-speech
Pamungkas, E. W., Basile, V. y Patti, V. (2020). Misogyny Detection in Twitter: a Multilingual and Cross-Domain Study. Information Processing & Management, 57(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102360
Puerta-Díaz, M., Ovalle-Perandones, M.-A. y Martínez-Ávila, D. (2020). Patrones y tendencias emergentes de la estructura científica internacional en el dominio «discurso del odio». Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação, 13(3), 963‑978. https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v13.n3.2020.33017
Risso Ferrand, M. (2020). La libertad de expresión y el combate al discurso del odio. Estudios constitucionales, 18(1), 51-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002020000100051
Santos, J. C. G., Martínez-Ávila, D. y Mello, M. R. G. (2022). Agenda 2030 e direitos humanos: análise da literatura iberoamericana publicada em ciência da informação. Ibersid, 16(2), 33-43.
Asociación Americana de Bibliotecas (2023). American Library Association reports record number of demands to censor library books and materials in 2022. News and Press Center. Disponible en: http://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2023/03/record-book-bans-2022
Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. y Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1119- 1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5
Van Eck, N. J. y Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer manual. Univeristeit Leiden.
Waltman, M. S. (2018). The normalizing of hate speech and how communication educators should respond. Communication Education, 67(2), 259-265.
Copyright (c) 2023 Aurora Cuevas-Cerveró, Daniel Martínez-Ávila, Mirelys Puerta-Diaz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




.png)












