Revisitando los metajuegos y el metajuego: consideraciones teóricas y metodológicas
Resumen
En el contexto del comportamiento de la información, los metajuegos y los metajuegos se han utilizado para referirse a actividades de segundo orden relacionadas con el trabajo de información que van más allá del "juego" esperado de empresas informativas. Este documento continúa la discusión anterior sobre metajuegos informativos y metajuegos al revisar los dos conceptos. Indaga más sobre cómo teorizar los metajuegos informativos y los metajuegos en términos y en relación con lo que hacen al trabajo de información, y discute brevemente cuestiones relacionadas con cómo estudiar empíricamente los metajuegos informacionales y los metajuegos. Se propone que el metajuego puede concebirse como una forma de trabajo de resistencia, reparación y ampliación de la información. Como actividad a menudo invisible, el estudio empírico del metajuego se complica por las dificultades para identificarlos, hacerlos visibles y delimitar cuándo una actividad califica como metajuego. Algunos de los beneficios potenciales de usar metajuegos como lente para investigar las actividades de información son que puede ayudar a arrojar luz sobre los componentes y fundamentos de los juegos y sus metajuegos relacionados, y mostrar y explicar la complejidad y la multinormatividad del trabajo de información. actividades relacionadas de segundo orden.
Descargas
Citas
Aldred, Jessica et al. (2007). “Playscripts a New Method for Analyzing Game Design and Play”. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play. Future Play ’07. New York: ACM, pp. 205–208. isbn: 978-1-59593-943-2. doi: 10.1145/1328202.1328240.
Alftberg, Åsa (2020). “Sharing Knowledge Neuroscience and the Circulation of Medical Knowledge”. In: Movement of Knowledge: Medical Humanities Perspectives on Medicine, Science, and Experience. Ed. by Kristofer Hansson and Rachel Irwin. Lund: Nordic Academic Press (Kriterium), pp. 91–109. DOI: 10.21525/kriterium.24.
Andersen, Linda (2012). “Inner and Outer Life at Work. The Roots and Horizon of Psychoanalytically Informed Work Life Research”. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13.3. ISSN: 1438-5627. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1902
Anderson, Ben (Dec. 2010). “Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies”. In: Progress in Human Geography 34.6, pp. 777–798. ISSN: 0309-1325. DOI: 10.1177/0309132510362600.
Axel, Erik (1997). “According Tools with Meaning within the Organization of Concrete Work Situations”. In: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Ed. by Geoffrey Bowker et al. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 159–188. ISBN: 0-8058-2402-2.
Azad, Bijan and Nelson King (July 2012). “Institutionalized Computer Workaround Practices in a Mediterranean Country: An Examination of Two Organizations”. In: European Journal of Information Systems 21.4, pp. 358–372. ISSN: 0960-085X. DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2011.48.
Barrett, Ashley Katherine (Apr. 2018). “Technological Appropriations as Workarounds: Integrating Electronic Health Records and Adaptive Structuration Theory Research”. In: Info Technology & People 31.2, pp. 368–387. ISSN: 0959-3845. DOI: 10.1108/itp-01-2016-0023.
Bassett, Kath (June 2018). “Metagaming: Playing, Competing, Spectating, Cheating, Trading, Making and Breaking Videogames”. In: New Media & Society 20.6, pp. 2226–2228. ISSN: 1461-4448. DOI: 10.1177/1461444818764422a.
Becker, Howard S. (1997). Outsiders: Studies in Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
Becker, Markus C. (2004). “Organizational Routines: A Review of the Literature”. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 13.4, pp. 643–678. ISSN: 0960-6491. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dth026.
Behrens, Sandy (Feb. 2009). “Shadow Systems: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”. In: Communications of the ACM 52.2, pp. 124–129. ISSN: 0001-0782. DOI: 10.1145/1461928.1461960.
Berg, Marc (1997). “Formal Tools and Medical Practices: Getting Computer-Based Decision Techniques to Work”. In: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Ed. by Geoffrey Bowker, Susan Leigh Star and Les Gasser. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chap. Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project, pp. 301–330.
Bialski, Paula and Götz Bachmann (2019). “Coffee Machine as a Mediating Technology of Organization”. In: The Oxford Handbook of Media, Technology, and Organization Studies. Ed. by Timon Beyes, Robin Holt and Claus Pias. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 116–124. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198809913.013.11.
Blomberg, Jeanette, Lucy Suchman and Randall H. Trigg (1997). “Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide”. In: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Ed. by Geoffrey Bowker, Susan Leigh Star and Les Gasser. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chap. Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project, pp. 189–215.
Boluk, Stephanie and Patrick LeMieux (2017). Metagaming: Playing, Competing, Spectating, Cheating, Trading, Making, and Breaking Videogames. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Börjesson, Lisa and Isto Huvila (2018). “Digital Archaeological Data for Future Knowledge-Making”. In: Archaeology and Archaeological Information in the Digital Society. Ed. by Isto Huvila. London: Routledge, pp. 14–36.
Börjesson, Lisa, Olle Sköld et al. (2022). “Re-Purposing Excavation Database Content as Paradata: An Explorative Analysis of Paradata Identification Challenges and Opportunities”. In: KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 6.3, pp. 1–18. ISSN: 2398-4112. DOI: 10.18357/kula.221.
Boyd, Michael J. et al. (Jan. 2021). “Open Area, Open Data: Advances in Reflexive Archaeological Practice”. In: Journal of Field Archaeology. ISSN: 0093-4690. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2020.1859780.
Broadbent, Stefana (2016). Intimacy at Work: How Digital Media Bring Private Life to the Workplace. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.
Bronstein, Jenny (Jan. 2019). “Reframing Integration: Information Marginalization and Information Resistance among Migrant Workers”. In: Journal of Documentation 76.1, pp. 27–48. ISSN: 0022-0418. DOI: 10.1108/JD-06-2019-0108.
Bruce, Christine et al. (2014). Information Experience Approaches to Theory and Practice. Bradford: Emerald, pp. –.
Buchanan, Sarah A. and Sanda Erdelez (Nov. 2019). “Information Encountering in the Humanities: Embeddedness, Temporality, and Altruism”. In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 56.1, pp. 32–42. ISSN: 2373-9231. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.58.
Carse, James (1986). Finite and Infinite Games. New York: Free Press. ISBN: 978-1-4767-3171-1.
Carter, Marcus, Martin Gibbs and Mitchell Harrop (2012). “Metagames, Paragames and Orthogames: A New Vocabulary”. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. FDG ’12. New York: ACM, pp. 11–17. ISBN: 978-1-4503-1333-9. DOI: 10.1145/2282338.2282346.
Chatman, Elfreda A. (1996). “The Impoverished Life-World of Outsiders”. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47.3, pp. 193–206.
Connaway, Lynn Sillipigni, Timothy J. Dickey and Marie L. Radford (2011). “If It Is Too Inconvenient I’m Not Going after It: Convenience as a Critical Factor in Information-Seeking Behaviors”. In: Library & Information Science Research 33.3, pp. 179–190. ISSN: 0740-8188. DOI: DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.002.
Corbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss (Sept. 1985). “Managing Chronic Illness at Home: Three Lines of Work”. In: Qualitative Sociology 8.3, pp. 224–247. ISSN: 1573-7837. DOI: 10.1007/BF00989485.
Corbin, Juliet M. and Anselm L. Strauss (1988). Unending Work and Care : Managing Chronic Illness at Home. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cox, Andrew M. (2013). “Information in Social Practice: A Practice Approach to Understanding Information Activities in Personal Photography”. In: Journal of Information Science 39.1, pp. 61–72. DOI: 10.1177/0165551512469767.
Dallas, Costis (2015). “Curating Archaeological Knowledge in the Digital Continuum: From Practice to Infrastructure”. In: Open Archaeology 1.1, pp. 176–207. ISSN: 23006560. DOI: 10.1515/opar-2015-0011.
Dalmer, Nicole K. (Mar. 2020). “‘Add Info and Stir’: An Institutional Ethnographic Scoping Review of Family Care-Givers’ Information Work”. In: Ageing and Society 40.3, pp. 663–689. ISSN: 0144-686X, 1469-1779. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X18001125.
Dalmer, Nicole K. and Isto Huvila (Jan. 2020). “Conceptualizing Information Work for Health Contexts in Library and Information Science”. In: Journal of Documentation 76.1, pp. 96–108. ISSN: 0022-0418. DOI: 10.1108/JD-03-2019-0055.
Davidović, Antonia (2009). Praktiken Archäologischer Wissensproduktion – Eine Kulturanthropologische Wissenschaftsforschung. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.
Debus, Michael S. (Aug. 2017). “Metagames: On the Ontology of Games Outside of Games”. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. FDG ’17. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–9. ISBN: 978-1-4503-5319-9. DOI: 10.1145/3102071.3102097.
Denis, Jérôme and David Pontille (May 2020). “Maintenance et attention à la fragilité”. In: SociologieS. ISSN: 1992-2655. DOI: 10.4000/sociologies.13936.
DuBois, Andrew (2003). “Close Reading: An Introduction”. In: Close Reading: A Reader. Ed. by Frank Lentricchia and Andrew DuBois. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–40.
Egliston, Ben (Dec. 2020). “Watch to Win? E-sport, Broadcast Expertise and Technicity in Dota 2”. In: Convergence 26.5-6, pp. 1174–1193. ISSN: 1354-8565. DOI: 10.1177/1354856519851180.
Engeström, Yrjö (1990). “When Is a Tool?” In: Learning, Working and Imagining, Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy, pp. 171–195.
Erickson, Ingrid and Steve Sawyer (2019). “Infrastructuring as Bricolage: Thinking like a Contemporary Knowledge Worker”. In: Thinking Infrastructures. Ed. by Martin Kornberger et al. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 321–334.
Fayard, Anne-Laure and John Weeks (2007). “Photocopiers and Water-Coolers: The Affordances of Informal Interaction”. In: Organization Studies 28.5, pp. 605–634. DOI: 10.1177/0170840606068310.
Felin, Teppo and Nicolai J. Foss (June 2009). “Organizational Routines and Capabilities: Historical Drift and a Course-Correction toward Microfoundations”. In: Scandinavian Journal of Management. Special Topic Forum on Faddishness in Academic Work 25.2, pp. 157–167. ISSN: 0956-5221. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.02.003.
Floegel, Diana and Kaitlin L. Costello (Jan. 2019). “Entertainment Media and the Information Practices of Queer Individuals”. In: Library & Information Science Research 41.1, pp. 31–38. ISSN: 0740-8188. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2019.01.001.
Forsythe, Diana E. (2002). “Blaming the User in Medical Informatics: The Cultural Nature of Scientific Practice”. In: Studying Those Who Study Us. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–15. ISBN: 978-1-5036-1937-1. DOI: 10.1515/9781503619371-003.
Foscarini, Fiorella and Juan Ilerbaig (2017). “Intertextuality in the Archives”. In: Archives in Liquid Times. Ed. by F. Smit, A. Glaudemans and R. Jonker. ’s-Gravenhage: Stichting Archiefpublicaties, pp. 177–194.
Frasca, Gonzalo (1999). “Ludologia Kohtaa Narratologian”. In: Parnasso 3, pp. 365–367.
Freeburg, Darin and Katie Klein (2022). “What Guides Knowledge Work in the Library? Maps, Routines, and Workarounds”. In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 59.1, pp. 76–88. ISSN: 2373-9231. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.606.
Garfield, Richard and Jim Dietz (2000). “Metagames”. In: Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Essays on Roleplaying. Charleston: Jolly Roger Games, pp. 14–21.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Gasser, Les (July 1986). “Integration of Computing and Routine Work”. In: ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4.3, pp. 205–225.
Gilbert, Clark G. and Clay M. Christensen (2005). “Anomaly-Seeking Research: Thirty Years of Development in Resource Allocation Theory”. In: From Resource-Allocation to Strategy. Ed. by Joseph L. Bower and Clark G. Gilbert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–92.
Godbold, Natalya (2013). “An Information Need for Emotional Cues: Unpacking the Role of Emotions in Sense Making”. In: Information Research 18.1. URL: http://informationr.net/ir/18-1/paper561.html
González, Victor M. and Gloria Mark (2004). “"Constant, Constant, Multi-tasking Craziness": Managing Multiple Working Spheres”. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’04. New York: ACM, pp. 113–120. ISBN: 1-58113-702-8. DOI: 10.1145/985692.985707.
Gorichanaz, Tim (2020). Information Experience in Theory and Design. Bingley: Emerald.
Graziano, Valeria and Kim Trogal (May 2019). “Repair Matters”. In: Ephemera 19.2, pp. 203–227. ISSN: 20521499.
Gregg, Melissa (2011). Wor s Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity.
Hartel, Jenna (2003). “The Serious Leisure Frontier in Library and Information Science: Hobby Domains”. In: Knowledge organization 30.3-4, pp. 228–238.
Hartel, Jenna, Andrew M. Cox and Brian L. Griffin (2016). “Information Activity in Serious Leisure”. In: Information Research 21.4. URL: http://www.informationr.net/ir/21-4/paper728.html
Hedstrom, Margaret (1993). Electronic Records Management Program Strategies. Pittsburgh: Archives & Museum Informatics.
Hjorth, Larissa (2011). Games and Gaming: An Introduction to New Media. Oxford: Berg.
Hjorth, Larissa et al. (2020). “Metagaming and Paratextual Play”. In: Exploring Minecraft: Ethnographies of Play and Creativity. Ed. by Larissa Hjorth et al. Palgrave Games in Context. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 99–120. ISBN: 978-3-030-59908-9. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59908-9_5.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell (2003). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution. New York: Penguin Books.
Howard, Nigel (1987). “The Present and Future of Metagame Analysis”. In: European Journal of Operational Research 32.1, pp. 1–25. ISSN: 0377-2217. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(87)90267-0.
Huang, Hsini et al. (Oct. 2020). “Resisting by Workarounds: Unraveling the Barriers of Implementing Open Government Data Policy”. In: Government Information Quarterly 37.4, p. 101495. ISSN: 0740-624X.
Huttunen, Aira and Terttu Kortelainen (Feb. 2021). “Meaning-Making on Gender: Deeply Meaningful Information in a Significant Life Change among Transgender People”. In: JASIST. ISSN: 2330-1635. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24447.
Huvila, Isto (2006). The Ecology of Information Work – A Case Study of Bridging Archaeological Work and Virtual Reality Based Knowledge Organisation. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press. URL: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:951-765-337-9
— (2008a). “Information Work Analysis: An Approach to Research on Information Interactions and Information Behaviour in Context”. In: Information Research 13.3. URL: http://www.informationr.net/ir/13-3/paper349.html
— (2008b). “Work and Work Roles: A Context of Tasks”. In: Journal of Documentation 64.6, pp. 797–815. DOI: 10.1108/00220410810912406.
— (2009). “Ecological Framework of Information Interactions and Information Infrastructures”. In: Journal of Information Science 35.6, pp. 695–708. DOI: 10.1177/0165551509336705.
— (2011a). “"I Asked My Mum, but" and Other Cases of Unsuccessful Information Seeking by Asking”. In: Information Research 16.1. URL: http://informationr.net/ir/16-1/paper460.html
— (2011b). “Mining Qualitative Data on Human Information Behaviour from the Web”. In: Information Und Wissen: Global, Sozial Und Frei? Proceedings Des 12. Internationalen Symposiums Für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) Hildesheim, 9. Bis 11. März 2011. Ed. by Joachim Griesbaum, Thomas Mandl and Christa Womser-Hacker. Boizenburg: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch, pp. 322–326.
— (2012). Information Services and Digital Literacy: In Search of the Boundaries of Knowing. Oxford: Chandos.
— (2013a). “"Library Users Come to a Library to Find Books": The Structuration of the Library as a Soft Information System”. In: Journal of Documentation 69.5, pp. 715–735. ISSN: 0022-0418. DOI: 10.1108/JD-06-2012-0080.
— (2013b). “How a Museum Knows? Structures, Work Roles, and Infrastructures of Information Work”. In: JASIST 64.7, pp. 1375–1387. DOI: 10.1002/asi.22852.
— (2013c). “In Web Search We Trust? Articulation of the Cognitive Authorities of Web Searching”. In: Information Research 18.1. URL: http://informationr.net/ir/18-1/paper567.html
— (2013d). “Meta-Games in Information Work”. In: Information Research 18.3, paperC01. URL: http://www.informationr.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC01.html
— (2014). “Archaeology of the Ballpoint Pen: Or the Interpretation and Significant Properties of Archaeological Findings”. In: Proceedings of CHNT18 International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, Vienna November 2013. Ed. by Wolfgang Börner and Susanne Uhlirz. Vienna: Museen der Stadt Wien – Stadtarchäologie, pp. 1–13. URL: http://www.chnt.at/wp-content/uploads/Huvila_2014.pdf
— (Mar. 2015). “Another Wood Between the Worlds? Regimes of Worth and the Making of Meanings in the Work of Archivists”. In: The Information Society 31.2, pp. 121–138. ISSN: 0197-2243. DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2015.998103.
— (2016). “’If We Just Knew Who Should Do It’, or the Social Organization of the Archiving of Archaeology in Sweden”. In: Information Research 21.2, Paper 713. URL: http://www.informationr.net/ir/21-2/paper713.html
— (2018a). “Alternatives to Being Information Literate”. In: Information Literacy in the Workplace. Ed. by S. Kurbanoğlu et al. Cham: Springer, pp. 813–821. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_82.
— (2018b). “Ecology of Archaeological Information Work”. In: Archaeology and Archaeological Information in the Digital Society. Ed. by Isto Huvila. London: Routledge, pp. 121–141.
— (June 2020). “Information at Work: Information Management in the Workplace. Edited by Katriina Byström, Jannica Heinström, and Ian Ruthven. London: Facet Publishing, 2019. 200 Pp. L69.95 (Paperback). (ISBN 9781783302758)”. In: JASIST 71.4, pp. 497–499. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24278.
— (2021). “Ambiguity, Standards and Contextual Distance: Archaeological Heritage Administrators and Their Information Work”. In: Open Information Science 5.1, pp. 190–214. DOI: 10.1515/opis-2020-0121.
— (2022). “Making and Taking Information”. In: JASIST 73.4, pp. 528–541. ISSN: 2330-1635. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24599.
Huvila, Isto et al. (2022). “Information Behavior and Practices Research Informing Information Systems Design”. In: JASIST 73.7, pp. 1043–1057. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24611.
Jackson, Steven J et al. (2014). “Rethinking Repair”. In: Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 221–39.
Jantke, Klaus P. (2010). Extra Game Play & Meta Game Play. Tech. rep. Erfurt: Fraunhofer IDMT.
Johnson, J. David (Sept. 2014). “Health-Related Information Seeking: Is It Worth It?” In: Information Processing & Management 50.5, pp. 708–717. ISSN: 0306-4573.
Kiourti, Elisavet (July 2022). “Layering Literacies and Metagaming in Counter Strike: Global Offensive”. In: L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, pp. 1–27. ISSN: 1573-1731. DOI: 10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.2.367.
Kizhakkethil, Priya (2021). “Information as Meaningful Experience”. In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 58.1, pp. 241–252. ISSN: 2373-9231. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.452.
Kleinman, Erica, Karina Caro and Jichen Zhu (Mar. 2020). “From Immersion to Metagaming: Understanding Rewind Mechanics in Interactive Storytelling”. In: Entertainment Computing 33, p. 100322. ISSN: 1875-9521. DOI: 10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100322.
Kokkinakis, Athanasios et al. (2021). “Metagaming and Metagames in Esports”. In: International Journal of Esports 1.1, pp. 1–24. ISSN: 2634-1069. URL: https://www.ijesports.org/article/51 (visited on 01/11/2022).
Kujala, Sari et al. (June 2022). “Patients’ Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-Sectional Survey”. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research 24.6, e37438. DOI: 10.2196/37438.
Landers, Richard N. (Mar. 2019). “Gamification Misunderstood: How Badly Executed and Rhetorical Gamification Obscures Its Transformative Potential”. In: Journal of Management Inquiry 28.2, pp. 137–140. ISSN: 1056-4926. DOI: 10.1177/1056492618790913.
Layman-Kennedy, Dan (2003). “Getting Back What You Give Away: The Pleasures of Metagaming”. In: The Last Dark Art: Exploring the Gaming Aesthetic (A RPGNet Column) 4. url: http://www.rpg.net/news+reviews/columns/darkart22jan03.html
Lee, Min Kyung et al. (2015). “Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers”. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seoul Republic of Korea: ACM, pp. 1603–1612. ISBN: 978-1-4503-3145-6. DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702548.
Lemieux, Victoria L. (2022). Searching for Trust: Blockchain Technology in an Age of Disinformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1-108-83487-2.
Levy, JasonK., KeithW. Hipel and N. Howard (2009). “Advances in Drama Theory for Managing Global Hazards and Disasters. Part I: Theoretical Foundation”. In: Group decision and negotiation 18.4, pp. 303–316. ISSN: 0926-2644. DOI: 10.1007/s10726-008-9145-7.
Lickteig, Seth Jordan (2020). “Metagaming: Cognition in Gaming Environments and Systems”. PhD thesis. Manhattan, KA: Kansas State University.
Lloyd, Annemaree and Michael Olsson (Aug. 2019). “Untangling the Knot: The Information Practices of Enthusiast Car Restorers”. In: JASIST 51.4, pp. 1033–1040. ISSN: 2330-1635. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24284.
Löwenborg, Daniel (2014). “Recuperating GIS Data from Excavations: On the Use, or Lack of Use, of Digital Archaeological Information”. In: Perspectives to Archaeological Information in the Digital Society. Ed. by Isto Huvila. Uppsala: Department of ALM, Uppsala University, pp. 11–23.
Magnusson, Boris and Sten Minör (1993). “Environments for Cooperative Software Development”. In: ACM SIGOIS Bulletin 13.4, p. 23.
Marwick, Ben (July 2020). “Open Access to Publications to Expand Participation in Archaeology”. In: Norwegian Archaeological Review 53.2, pp. 163–169. ISSN: 0029-3652. DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2020.1837233.
Mäyrä, Frans (2008). An Introduction to Game Studies: Games in Culture. London: Sage.
McCoy, Chase and Howard Rosenbaum (Mar. 2019). “Uncovering Unintended and Shadow Practices of Users of Decision Support System Dashboards in Higher Education Institutions”. In: JASIST 70.4, pp. 370–384. ISSN: 2330-1635. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24131.
McKenzie, P.J. (2003). “A Model of Information Practices in Accounts of Everyday-Life Information Seeking”. In: Journal of Documentation 59.1, pp. 19–40.
Moll, Jonas et al. (2018). “Patients’ Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden”. In: JMIR 20.11, e278. ISSN: 1438-8871. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9492.
Moralde, Oscar (2019). “Wait Wait... Don’t Play Me: The Clicker Game Genre and Configuring Everyday Temporalities”. In: InVisible Culture 30. DOI: 0.47761/494a02f6.0cf44974.
Nahl, Diane and Dania Bilal, eds. (2007). Information and Emotion: The Emergent Affective Paradigm in Information Behavior Research and Theory. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
Nicol, Emma et al. (2022). “Information Intermediaries and Information Resilience: Working to Support Marginalised Groups”. In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 59.1, pp. 469–473. ISSN: 2373-9231. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.654.
Ocepek, Melissa G. (2017). “Bringing out the Everyday in Everyday Information Behavior”. In: Journal of Documentation 74.2, pp. 398–411. ISSN: 0022-0418. DOI: 10.1108/jd-10-2016-0119.
Oudshoorn, Nelly and Trevor J. Pinch (2008). “User-Technology Relationships: Some Recent Developments”. In: The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Ed. by Edward J. Hackett et al. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 541–565.
Pétursdóttir, Þóra (July 2020). “Collaborative, Public, Participatory: Pros and Cons of an Open Archaeology”. In: Norwegian Archaeological Review. ISSN: 0029-3652. DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2020.1782463.
Pfau-Effinger, Birgit, Lluís Flaquer and Per H. Jensen (2012). Formal and Informal Work: The Hidden Work Regime in Europe. London: Routledge.
Philip, Kavita (2005). “What Is a Technological Author? The Pirate Function and Intellectual Property”. In: Postcolonial Studies 8.2, pp. 199–218. ISSN: 1368-8790. DOI: 10.1080/13688790500153596.
Pilerot, Ola (2016). “A Practice-Based Exploration of the Enactment of Information Literacy among PhD Students in an Interdisciplinary Research Field”. In: Journal of Documentation 72.3, pp. 414–434. ISSN: 0022-0418. DOI: 10.1108/JD-05-2015-0056.
Polkinghorne, Sarah and Lisa M. Given (Feb. 2021). “Holistic Information Research: From Rhetoric to Paradigm”. In: JASIST 72.10, pp. 1261–1271. ISSN: 2330-1635. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24450.
Poole, Alex H. (2022). “Intersectional Information Work Practices: Surfacing Care COVID-19”. In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 59.1, pp. 486–493. ISSN: 2373-9231. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.657.
Prensky, Marc (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ruokolainen, Hilda (Oct. 2022). “A Methodological Approach to Misinformation: An Analysis of the Data Creation Process in Two Interview Studies”. In: Information Research 27. ISSN: 13681613. DOI: 10.47989/colis2229.
Ryan, Marie-Laure (2006). “Computer Games as Narrative: The Ludology versus Narrativism Controversy”. In: Dichtung Digital. Journal für Kunst und Kultur digitaler Medien 8.1, pp. 1–297. DOI: 10.25969/mediarep/17696.
Sakellariadi, Anastasia (2015). “Data from Archaeology for the People? Greek Archaeology and Its Public: An Analysis of the Socio-Political and Economic Role of Archaeology in Greece”. In: Journal of Open Archaeology Data 4, e1. DOI: 10.5334/joad.af.
Savolainen, Reijo (1995). “Everyday Life Information Seeking: Approaching Information Seeking in the Context of "Way of Life"”. In: Library and Information Science Research 17.3, pp. 259–94.
— (2008). Everyday Information Practices : A Social Phenomenological Perspective. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
— (2014). “Emotions as Motivators for Information Seeking: A Conceptual Analysis”. In: Library & Information Science Research 36.1, pp. 59–65. ISSN: 0740-8188. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.10.004.
— (2016). “Elaborating the Conceptual Space of Information-Seeking Phenomena”. In: Information Reseach 20.1, paper 720. URL: http://www.informationr.net/ir/21-3/paper720.html
— (June 2022). What Drives People to Prefer Health-Related Misinformation? The Viewpoint of Motivated Reasoning. Text. DOI: 10.47989/irpaper927.
Schabacher, Gabriele (2017). “Im Zwischenraum Der Lösungen. Reparaturarbeit Und Workarounds”. In: ilinx 4, pp. i–xxviii.
Schymik, Gregory et al. (2015). “The Benefits and Costs of Using Metadata to Improve Enterprise Document Search”. In: Decision Sciences 46.6, pp. 1049–1075. ISSN: 0011-7315. DOI: 10.1111/deci.12154.
Scott, James C. (Jan. 1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN: 978-0-300-03641-1.
— (1989). “Everyday Forms of Resistance”. In: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1-315-49145-5.
Segar, Michelle, Donna Spruijt-Metz and Susan Nolen-Hoeksema (2006). “Go Figure? Body-Shape Motives Are Associated with Decreased Physical Activity Participation Among Midlife Women”. In: Sex Roles 54.3, pp. 175–187. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-006-9336-5.
Sellers, M. (1973). “The Secret Notebook for the Practicing Archaeologist: With Preliminary Notes toward an Ethno-Science of Archaeology”. In: Plains Anthropologist 18.60, pp. 140–148. DOI: 10.1080/2052546.1973.11908657.
Shaw, Patricia (Jan. 1997). “Intervening in the Shadow Systems of Organizations: Consulting from a Complexity Perspective”. In: Journal of Organizational Change Management 10.3, pp. 235–250. ISSN: 0953-4814. DOI: 10.1108/09534819710171095.
Sholler, Dan (Aug. 2020). “Infrastructuring as an Occasion for Resistance: Organized Resistance to Policy-Driven Information Infrastructure Development in the U.S. Healthcare Industry”. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ISSN: 1573-7551. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-020-09375-z.
Smith, Dorothy E (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Rowman Altamira.
Solomon, Paul (1997). “Discovering Information Behavior in Sense Making. I. Time and Timing”. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48.12, pp. 1097–1108. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199712)48:12%3C1097::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-P.
Steinkuehler, Constance (2007). “Massively Multiplayer Online Gaming as a Constellation of Literacy Practices”. In: E-learning 4.3, pp. 297–318.
Stenros, Jaakko, Janne Paavilainen and Frans Mäyrä (2009). “The Many Faces of Sociability and Social Play in Games”. In: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era. MindTrek ’09. New York: ACM, pp. 82–89. ISBN: 978-1-60558-633-5. DOI: 10.1145/1621841.1621857.
Suchman, Lucy (1987). Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
— (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Second. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talja, Sanna, Kimmo Tuominen and Reijo Savolainen (2005). “"Isms" in Information Science: Constructivism, Collectivism and Constructionism”. In: Journal of Documentation 61.1, pp. 79–101.
Tan, Wey-Han (2011). “The Breaking of the Circle. Playing with, through, against Medial Boundaries”. In: Future Learning Spaces: Papers and Presentations from Designs on e-Learning 2011. Ed. by Stefan Sonvilla-Weiss and Owen Kelly. Helsinki, pp. 240–250.
Taylor, James R., Geoffrey Gurd and Thierry Bardini (1997). “The Worldviews of Cooperative Work”. In: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Ed. by Geoffrey Bowker, Susan Leigh Star and Les Gasser. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chap. Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project, pp. 379–413.
VanValkenburgh, Parker et al. (2018). “Mobilization as Mediation: Implementing a Tablet-Based Recording System for Ceramic Classification”. In: Advances in Archaeological Practice, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2018.12.
Vesa, Mikko and J. Tuomas Harviainen (Mar. 2019). “Gamification: Concepts, Consequences, and Critiques”. In: Journal of Management Inquiry 28.2, pp. 128–130. ISSN: 1056-4926. DOI: 10.1177/1056492618790911.
Vyas, Dhaval, Gerrit Veer and Anton Nijholt (2013). “Creative Practices in the Design Studio Culture: Collaboration and Communication”. In: 15.4, pp. 415–443–. ISSN: 1435-5558. DOI: 10.1007/s10111-012-0232-9.
Warwick, Claire et al. (2009). “Cognitive Economy and Satisficing in Information Seeking: A Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Information Behavior”. In: JASIST 60.12, pp. 2402–2415. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21179.
Waskul, Dennis D. (2006). “The Role-Playing Game and the Game of Role-Playing: The Ludic Self and Everyday Life”. In: Gaming as Culture: Essays on Reality, Identity, and Experience in Fantasy Games. Ed. by J. Patrick Williams, Sean Q. Hendricks and W. Keith Winkler. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, pp. 19–38.
Whillans, Ashley, Leslie Perlow and Aurora Turek (Mar. 2021). “Experimenting during the Shift to Virtual Team Work: Learnings from How Teams Adapted Their Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic”. In: Information and Organization 31.1, p. 100343. ISSN: 1471-7727. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100343.
Wilson, T.D. (2000). “Human Information Behavior”. In: Informing Science 3.2, pp. 49–55.
Zheng, Han and Shaohai Jiang (Jan. 2022). “Frequent and Diverse Use of Electronic Health Records in the United States: A Trend Analysis of National Surveys”. In: Digital health 8, p. 20552076221112840. ISSN: 2055-2076. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221112840.
Zimmerman, Margaret S. and Chaoqun Ni (Feb. 2021). “What We Talk about When We Talk about Information Literacy”. In: IFLA Journal 47.4, pp. 453–467. ISSN: 0340-0352. DOI: 10.1177/0340035221989367.
Derechos de autor 2023 Isto Huvila
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.
