Las Hierarchical classifications of terms in library sciences

  • Catalina Naumis Peña Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3152-3958
  • Hugo Alberto Guadarrama Sánchez Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-8015
Keywords: HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION, INFORMATION RESOURCES, CATEGORIES OF INFORMATION RESOURCES, LIBRARY SCIENCE

Abstract

The documentary organization has a transcendent role in the social process as a bridge between the sources of knowledge and society. To the extent that it offers good intermediation solutions, it will be a fundamental stone in access to information to improve the quality of life. The dissemination of knowledge depends on a brief, exact, clear, consistent, uniform, and concise documentary organization in different areas, from the traditional ones in libraries or databases or currently in the creation of institutional repositories or in the organization of content educational. The objective of this work is to explain the process that gave guidelines to the decisions taken to make hierarchical proposals in the assignment of categories of a thesaurus specialized in Library Science, Archives and Information, taking as an example the area of Information Resources. The methodology was based on terminological research carried out in the field of knowledge, through the deepening of the designations present in specialized works such as glossaries, dictionaries, encyclopedias, existing controlled vocabularies, but especially in university academic works. and study programs, confronted with the uses in practice. The terms obtained were contrasted in the unstructured interviews carried out with the experts in the topics covered by the specialty. Finally, a basic hierarchical structure of Information Resources is proposed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abubakar, D. (2020). Availability and Accessibility of Information Resources in University Libraries for Students' Academic Use: A Case Study of Pharmaceutical Science Students of the University of Jos. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal). Recuperado de https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/345180808.pdf

Barité Roqueta, M. G. (1999). La noción de categoría y sus implicancias en la construcción y evaluación de lenguajes documentales. En M. J. López Huertas (Ed.), actas del IV Congreso ISKO-España EOCONSID 99. 22-24 de abril de 1999, Granada (págs. 39-45). Granada: Universidad de Granada.

Brown University Library. (2022). Recuperado de https://library.brown.edu/

Caminotti, M. L. y Martínez A. M. (2007). Fútbol, tesauros y taxonomías WEB: desafíos del control del vocabulario. Información, Cultura y Sociedad, 14, 73-81.

Campos Arenas, A. (2005). Mapas conceptuales, mapas mentales y otras formas de representación del conocimiento. Bogotá: Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.

Chan, L. M. (1981). Cataloging and classification: an introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Currás, E. (1999). Enfoque sistémico de la clasificación documental. En M. Pinto, Manual de clasificación documental (págs. 49-63). Madrid: Síntesis.

Dag Hammarskjöld Library. (2022). New York. Recuperado de https://www.un.org/en/library

Kingdom: Chandos Publishing.

Gil Urdiciain, B. (1996). Manual de lenguajes documentales. Madrid: Editorial Noesis. Madrid: Editorial Noesis.

Guallar, J., Pedraza-Jiménez, R., Pérez Montoro, M. y Anton, L. (2021). Curación de contenidos en periodismo. Indicadores y buenas prácticas. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 44(2), 3-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2021.2.1742

Hussain, A. y Kumar, K. (2013). Utilization of Information Resources and Services of the Master School of Management Library: A Study. International Jou. International Journal of Library Science, 9(3), 39-52. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236861848_Utilization_of_Information_Resources_and_Services_of_the_Master_School_of_Management_Library_A_Study

Kavitha, R. (2009). Collection development in digital libraries: Trends and problems. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2(12), 68-73.

Kenchakkanavar, A. (2014). Types of e-resources and its utilities in library. International. . Journal of Information and Services, 1(2). Recuperado de https://uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/media/lectures/8/8_2018_12_19!10_28_26_PM.pdf

Lara, L. (1999). Concepts and Term Hierarchy. Terminology, 5(1), 59-76.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, volumen 1. Ed imburgo: Cambridge University Press. Lyons, J. (1997). Semántica lingüística: una introducción. (T. y. Alcoba, Trad.) Barcelona: Paidós.

Marzal, M. y Martínez Cardama, S. (2020). Clasificación de la investigación académica en metaliteracy. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 43(4), e279. Recuperado de https://redc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/redc/article/view/1305/2041

Maturana, H. V. (2003). El árbol del conocimiento: las bases biológicas del entendimiento humano. Buenos Aires: Lumen.

Mohammed, Z. O. (2020). Information Systems, Resources & Services. Nigeria: National Open University of Nigeria. Pág. 21. Recuperado de. Nigeria:

Resources & Services. Nigeria: National Open University of Nigeria. Recuperado de https://nou.edu.ng/coursewarecontent/LIS%20105_0.pdf

Moreira, A. A. (2004). Thesaurus and Ontology: A Study of the Definitions Found in the Computer and Information Science Literature by Means of an Analytical-Synthetic Method. 31(4). Knowledge Organization, 31(4), 231-244.

Moreiro González, J. A. (2004). El contenido de los documentos textuales: su análisis y representación mediante el lenguaje natural. Gijón: Ediciones Trea.

Naumis, P. C. (2003). Indización y clasificación: Un problema conceptual y terminológico. Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información, 23-40.

Ontoria, A. [. (1992). Mapas conceptuales: una técnica para aprender. Madrid: Narcea.

Peirce, C. (1987). Obra lógico-semiótica. Madrid: Taurus.

Reitz, J. M. (2004). ODLIS. Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science. Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited. Recuperado de http://biblioteca.udgvirtual.udg.mx/jspui/handle/123456789/1379

The National Institute of Open Schooling. (2020). “Types of Information Sources”. Library Science. India: NIOS. Recuperado de http://digital.nios.ac.in/topic.php?id=339en06

Ullmann, S. (1965) Semántica: introducción a la ciencia del significad o / tr. Juan Martín Ruiz-Werner. Madrid : Aguilar. 320 p.

Xie, I. J. (2010). Selection of information sources: Accessibility of and familiarity with sources, and types of tasks. Asist, 46(1), 1-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460215

Zenteno, Carlos (1999-2000). El entrañamiento: ¿Inferencia proposicional o léxica? Lenguas Modernas 26-27, 227 -244.

Published
2022-12-15
How to Cite
Naumis Peña, C., & Guadarrama Sánchez, H. (2022). Las Hierarchical classifications of terms in library sciences. Informatio, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.35643/Info.27.2.5
Section
Dossier: "Documentación", coordinado por el Dr. José López Yepes (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España)