The cost of article processing charges (APC) for Uruguay: the price of open access is high

  • Juan Pablo Tosar Unidad de Bioquímica Analítica, Centro de Investigaciones Nucleares, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República; Laboratorio de Genómica Funcional, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2021-2479
Keywords: scientific articles, scientific journals, open access, golden route, article processing charges

Abstract

Increasingly, scientific publications are made in journals that offer free access to their content. This open access can be funded in several ways. One of them involves demanding a payment from researchers for each published article. These Article Processing Charges (APCs) can climb to over $ 10,000 per article. Here, we set out to investigate the type of journals in which Uruguayan researchers publish. We corroborate that open access has grown strongly in the last decade, regardless of the area of knowledge. However, the tendency to pay or not for APCs varies enormously between disciplines and is strongly associated with the tendency to publish in English. Based on the number of publications in “gold” open access journals made by Uruguayan researchers and considering the proportion of journals that require APCs by discipline, we conclude that the costs for payment of APCs have multiplied by four between 2016 and 2019. These costs are currently around $ 200,000 per year, with an upward trend. Policies on the matter should be reconsidered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre-Ligüera, N., Maldini, J., & Fontans, E. (2019). Acceso abierto a la producción científica de Uruguay: poca historia en 10 años (2009-2018). Palabra Clave (La Plata), 9(1), e079–e079.

Alberts, B. (2013). Impact Factor Distortions. Science, 340(6134), 787–787.

Babini, D. (2019). Pagar por publicar no es el camino. https://www.clacso.org/en/pagar-por-publicar-no-es-el-camino. Acceso: 16/10/2021.

Becerril-García, A. (2019). AmeliCA vs Plan S: Same target, two different strategies to achieve Open Access. http://amelica.org/index.php/en/2019/02/10/amelica-vs-plan-s-same-target-two-different-strategies-to-achieve-open-access. Acceso: 16/10/2021

Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65.

Brainard, J. (2021a). Open access takes flight. Science, 371(6524), 16-20.

Brainard, J. (2021b). Science journals to offer select authors open-access publishing for free. https://www.science.org/content/article/science-journals-offer-select-authors-open-access-publishing-free. Acceso: 16/10/2021

Crespo, J. L. (2019). Acceso abierto vía diamante en revistas científicas latinoamericanas. Tlatemoani, 10(30), 170-187.

Else, H. (2020). Nature journals reveal terms of landmark open-access option. Nature, 588(7836), 19–20.

Gandelman, N., Parcero, O., Pereira, M., & Roldán, F. (2021). Ventajas comparativas reveladas en disciplinas científicas y tecnológicas en Uruguay. Universidad ORT (Ed.), Documento de investigación Nº 125.

Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., … Lalu, M. M. (2019). Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature 2021 576:7786, 576(7786), 210–212.

Hayes, J. (1995). The internet’s first victim? Forbes, 200–201.

Krauskopf, E. (2021). Article processing charge expenditure in Chile: The current situation. Learned Publishing, 34(4), 637-646.

Laakso, M. (2013). Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 2013 99:2, 99(2), 475–494.

Luchilo, L. J. (2019). Revistas científicas: oligopolio y acceso abierto. Revista CTS, 14(40), 41–79.

Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., … Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6(2), e4375.

Sever, R., Eisen, M., & Inglis, J. (2019). Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates. PLOS Biology, 17(6), e3000273.

Singh Chawla, D. (2021). Hundreds of ‘predatory’ journals indexed on leading scholarly database. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00239-0. Acceso: 16/10/2021.

Sutz, J. (2014). Calidad y relevancia en la investigación universitaria: apuntes para avanzar hacia su convergencia. Revista CTS, No, 27, 63–83.

Swan, A. (2013). Directrices para políticas de desarrollo y promoción del acceso abierto. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000222536. Acceso: 16/10/2021.

Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5, 632.

Vélez, G., Restrepo, D., Uribe, A., Gutiérrez, G., Zapata, O., Pallares, C., & Suárez, M. (2020). Identificación de pagos de APC por parte de las instituciones de educación superior (IES) colombianas: énfasis en las pertenecientes al Consorcio Colombia. Universidad de Antioquía (Ed.), 1–75. http://eprints.rclis.org/40494/. Acceso: 16/10/2021.

Published
2022-06-06
How to Cite
Tosar, J. P. (2022). The cost of article processing charges (APC) for Uruguay: the price of open access is high. Informatio, 27(1), 226-253. https://doi.org/10.35643/Info.27.1.1
Section
Articles