From disclosure to traceability: editorial governance of artificial intelligence in Open Science

  • José Eduardo Santarem Segundo Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Educação, Informação e Comunicação. Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Monte Alegre, CEP 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3360-7872
Keywords: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, EDITORIAL GOVERNANCE, RESEARCH INTEGRITY, INFORMATION RELIABILITY

Abstract

Review of the book Inteligência artificial na editoração científica em Ciência Aberta: riscos, integridade científica e governança editorial, by Bernardo Dionízio Vechi, Milton Shintaku, Maria Aniolly Queiroz Maia and Rosilene Paiva Marinho de Sousa (Editora Ibict, 2026). The book maps the entry points of artificial intelligence into the editorial workflow and translates integrity principles into verifiable routines, organized by stage (submission, peer review, copyediting, metadata curation and post-publication). The review describes the structure of the book and assesses it from the perspective of information reliability, the semantic web and the use of AI agents. It highlights the central role given to metadata and traceability, the treatment of automated outputs as signals rather than verdicts, and the attention paid to hidden prompt injection in manuscripts. As limitations and agenda, it notes the lack of empirical validation of the model, the limited exploration of machine-readable representations of AI-use disclosures, the tensions between hidden probes and accessibility, and the role of journals as producers of the corpora that feed generative systems. It concludes that the book is a timely reference of high practical value for Ibero-American editors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., e Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43.

Greshake, K., Abdelnabi, S., Mishra, S., Endres, C., Holz, T., e Fritz, M. (2023). Not what you’ve signed up for: compromising real-world LLM-integrated applications with indirect prompt injection. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (pp. 79-90). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3605764.3623985

Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., e McGuinness, D. (Eds.). (2013). PROV-O: the PROV ontology. W3C Recommendation. Recuperado de https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/

Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N.,… Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (pp. 9459-9474). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.

National Information Standards Organization. (2021). JATS: Journal Article Tag Suite, version 1.3 (ANSI/NISO Z39.96-2021). Baltimore, MD: NISO.

Vechi, B. D., Shintaku, M., Maia, M. A. Q., e Sousa, R. P. M. de. (2026). Inteligência artificial na editoração científica em Ciência Aberta: riscos, integridade científica e governança editorial. Brasília, DF: Editora Ibict. https://doi.org/10.22477/9788570132253

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Published
2026-11-10
How to Cite
Santarem Segundo, J. (2026). From disclosure to traceability: editorial governance of artificial intelligence in Open Science. Informatio, 31(2), e701. https://doi.org/10.35643/Info.31.2.17
Section
Reviews